| HOME |
Click here to Read about Brutality Towards Veterans
.
.
.
.
The below two
.
Below is an excerpt from the Judgment of Divorce depicting the Violation of Federal Laws:
Why did the State of Michigan not follow serveral Federal Laws and Supreme Court rulings on the above?
Above you will read that the former spouse was awarded 50% of my Military VA Disability Pay as a property settlement. Per Federal Law, Military VA Disability Pay cannot be treated as property and cannot be assigned to ex-spouse. U.S. Code, Title 38, Section 5301 paragraph (3)(A) reads that even if I enter into an agreement for someone else to receive my VA Disability Pay, such agreement shall be deemed to be an assignment and is prohibited. Also, this act invokes the anti-assignment provision of the Veterans Benefits Act, 38 USC 5301 to bar any back-door payments. Also note, that the USFSPA Federal Law prohibits any treatment of disability pay as disposable pay and the courts cannot work around this prohibition by allocating other assets to "make-up" for the lost disability pay. Additionally, the consent judgment of divorce improperly and in violation of Federal Law, awarded my former spouse 50% of my Military Retainer Pay. Specifically, the language dividing retired pay is faulty and does not follow Federal Regulations. In order for an award to be enforceable, it must be expressed either as a fixed dollar amount or as a percentage of disposable retired pay in accordance with the unjust Uniformed Services Former Spouse Protection Act USFSPA (Title 10, Section 1408), Dividing Military Retired/Retainer Pay.
Judge Miller above swearing-in his wife Congresswoman Miller, 10th District, MI As noted above, Judge Miller signed-off on the Violation of Federal Laws. Note that my attorney failed to even sign the original document. Now, read how Judge Switalski issues an ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT to uphold the above illegal rulings: | ||||||
|
